Short Project Intro

Funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, the project started in June 2019 and has two goals:

• Answer the following questions:
  • How is data edited in Wikipedia and Wikidata?
  • Where does it come from?
  • How can we synchronize it globally?
• Build an information system to synchronize facts between all Wikipedia language-editions, Wikidata, DBpedia and eventually multiple external sources, while also providing respective references. 

In order to help Wikipedians to maintain their infoboxes, check for factual correctness, and also improve data in Wikidata, we use data from Wikipedia infoboxes of different languages, Wikidata, and DBpedia and fuse them into our PreFusion dataset (in JSON-LD). More information on the fusion process, which is the engine behind GFS, can be found in the FlexiFusion paper.

Can’t join the conference or want to find out more about GlobalFactSync?

No problem, the poster we are presenting at the conference is currently available here and will soon be available here. Additionally, why not go through our project timeline, follow up on our progress so far and find out what’s coming up next.

In case you have specific questions regarding GlobalfactSync or even some helpful feedback just ping us via dbpedia@infai.org. We also have our new DBpedia Forum, home to the DBpedia Comunity, which just waits for you to initialize a discussion around GlobalFactSync. Why not start it now?

For general DBpedia news and updates follow us on Twitter.

…And if you are in Berlin at WikiDataCon2019 stop by our poster and talk to our developers. They are looking forward to vital exchanges with you.

All the best

yours,

DBpedia Association

The post GlobalFactSync and WikiDataCon2019 appeared first on DBpedia Association.

How is data edited in Wikipedia/Wikidata? Where does it come from? And how can we synchronize it globally?  

The GlobalFactSync (GFS) Project — funded by the Wikimedia Foundation — started in June 2019 and has two goals:

• Answer the above-mentioned three questions.
• Build an information system to synchronize facts between all Wikipedia language-editions and Wikidata. 

Now we are seven weeks into the project (10+ more months to go) and we are releasing our first prototypes to gather feedback. 

How – Synchronization vs Consensus

We follow an absolute “Human(s)-in-the-loop” approach when we talk about synchronization. The final decision whether to synchronize a value or not should rest with a human editor who understands consensus and the implications. There will be no automatic imports. Our focus is to drastically reduce the time to research all references for individual facts.

A trivial example to illustrate our reasoning is the release date of the single “Boys Don’t Cry” (March 16th, 1989) in the English, Japanese, and French Wikipedia, Wikidata and finally in the external open database MusicBrainz.  A human editor might need 15-30 minutes finding and opening all different sources, while our current prototype can spot differences and display them in 5 seconds.

We already had our first successful edit where a Wikipedia editor fixed the discrepancy with our prototype: “I’ve updated Wikidata so that all five sources are in agreement.” We are now working on the following tasks:

• Scaling the system to all infoboxes, Wikidata and selected external databases (see below on the difficulties there)
• Making the system:
  •  “live” without stale information
  • “reliable” with less technical errors when extracting and indexing data
  • “better referenced” by not only synchronizing facts but also references 

Contributions and Feedback

To ensure that GlobalFactSync will serve and help the Wikiverse we encourage everyone to try our data and micro-services and leave us some feedback, either on our Meta-Wiki page or via email. In the following 10+ months, we intend to improve and build upon these initial results. At the same time, these microservices are available to every developer to exploit it and hack useful applications. The most promising contributions will be rewarded and receive the book “Engineering Agile Big-Data Systems”. Please post feedback or any tool or GUI here. In case you need changes to be made to the API, please let us know, too.
For the ambitious future developers among you, we have some budget left that we will dedicate to an internship. In order to apply, just mention it in your feedback post. 

Finally, to talk to us and other GlobalfactSync-Users you may want to visit WikidataCon and Wikimania, where we will present the latest developments and the progress of our project. 

Data, APIs & Microservices (Technical prototypes) 

Data Processing and Infobox Extraction

For GlobalFactSync we use data from Wikipedia infoboxes of different languages, as well as Wikidata, and DBpedia and fuse them to receive one big, consolidated dataset – a PreFusion dataset (in JSON-LD). More information on the fusion process, which is the engine behind GFS, can be found in the FlexiFusion paper. One of our next steps is to integrate MusicBrainz into this process as an external dataset. We hope to implement even more such external datasets to increase the amount of available information and references. 

First microservices 

We deployed a set of microservices to show the current state of our toolchain.

• [Initial User Interface] The GlobalFactSync UI prototype (available at http://global.dbpedia.org) shows all extracted information available for one entity for different sources. It can be used to analyze the factual consensus between different Wikipedia articles for the same thing. Example: Look at the variety of population counts for Grimma.

• [PreFusion JSON API] While the UI allows simple, fast and easy browsing for one entity at a time, we also provide raw access to the underlying data (PreFusion dump). The query UI (http://global.dbpedia.org:8990 (user: read, pw: gfs) can be utilized to run simple analytical queries. Thus, we can determine the number of locations having at least one population value (1,194,007) but can also focus on examples with data quality problems (e.g. one of the 4,268 locations with more than 10 population values). Moreover, documentation about the PreFusion dataset and the download link for the data are available on the Databus website. 

• [Reference Data Download] We ran the Reference Extraction Service over 10 Wikipedia languages. Download dumps here.

• [Reference Extraction Service] Good references are crucial for an import of facts from Wikipedia to Wikidata. We are currently working with colleagues from Poznań University of Economics and Business on reference extraction for facts from Wikipedia. A current development reference extraction microservice shows all references and the location where they were spotted in the Infobox – ad hoc – for a given article: http://dbpedia.informatik.uni-leipzig.de:8111/infobox/references?article=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook&format=json  ( ‘&format=tsv’ also available) 

• [Infobox Extraction Service] A similar ad hoc extraction of factual information from infoboxes and other Wikipedia article information is available here. This microservice displays information which can be extracted with the help of DBpedia mappings from an infobox e.g. from the German Facebook Wikipedia article: http://dbpedia.informatik.uni-leipzig.de:9998/server/extraction/en/extract?title=Facebook&revid=&format=trix&extractors=mappings. See here for more options: http://dbpedia.informatik.uni-leipzig.de:9999/server/extraction/.

• [ID service] Last but not least, we offer the Global ID Resolution Service. It ties together all available identifiers for one thing (i.e. at the moment all DBpedia/Wikipedia and Wikidata identifiers – MusicBrainz coming soon…) and shows their stable DBpedia Global ID. 

Finding sync targets

In order to test out our algorithms, we started by looking at various groups of subjects, our so-called sync targets. Based on the different subjects a set of problems were identified with varying layers of complexity:

• identity check/check for ambiguity — Are we talking about the same entity? 
• fixed vs. varying property — Some properties vary depending on nationality (e.g., release dates), or point in time (e.g., population count).
• reference — Depending on the entity’s identity check and the property’s fixed or varying state the reference might vary. Also, for some targets, no query-able online reference might be available.
• normalization/conversion of values — Depending on language/nationality of the article properties can have varying units (e.g., currency, metric vs imperial system).

The check for ambiguity is the most crucial step to ensure that the infoboxes that are being compared do refer to the same entity. We found, instances where the Wikipedia page and the infobox shown on that page were presenting information about different subjects (e.g., see here).

Examples

As a good sync target to start with the group ‘NBA players’ was identified. There are no ambiguity issues, it is a clearly defined group of persons, and the amount of varying properties is very limited. Information seems to be derived from mainly two web sites (nba.com and basketball-reference.com) and normalization is only a minor issue. ‘Video games’ also proved to be an easy sync target, with the main problem being varying properties such as different release dates for different platforms (Microsoft Windows, Linux, MacOS X, XBox) and different regions (NA vs EU).

More difficult topics, such as ‘cars’, ’music albums’, and ‘music singles’ showed more potential for ambiguity as well as property variability. A major concern we found was Wikipedia pages that contain multiple infoboxes (often seen for pages referring to a certain type of car, such as this one). Reference and fact extraction can be done for each infobox, but currently, we run into trouble once we fuse this data. 

Further information about sync targets and their challenges can be found on our Meta-Wiki discussion page, where Wikipedians that deal with infoboxes on a regular basis can also share their insights on the matter. Some issues were also found regarding the mapping of properties. In order to make GlobalFactSync as applicable as possible, we rely on the DBpedia community to help us improve the mappings. If you are interested in participating, we will connect with you at http://mappings.dbpedia.org and in the DBpedia forum.  

Bottomline – We value your feedback

Your DBpedia Association

The post Global Fact Sync – Synchronizing Wikidata & Wikipedia’s infoboxes appeared first on DBpedia Association.

A growth hack – how come?

Things have gone a bit quiet around DBpedia. No new releases, no clear direction to go. Did DBpedia stop? Actually not. There were community and board member meetings, discussions, 500 messages per week on dbpedia.slack.com.

We are still there. We, as a community, restructured and now we are done, which means that DBpedia will now work more focused to build on its Technology Leadership role in the Web of Data and thus – with our very own DBpedia Growth Hack – bring new innovation and free fuel to everybody.

What is this growth hack?

We restructured in two areas:

1. The agility of knowledge delivery –  our release cycle was too slow and too expensive. We were unable to include substantial contributions from DBpedians. Therefore, quality and features stagnated.
2. Transparent processes – DBpedia has a crafty community with highly skilled knowledge engineers backing it. At some point, we grew too much and became lumpy, with a big monolithic system that nobody could improve because of side effects. So we designed a massive curation infrastructure where information can be retrieved, adjusted and errors discussed and fixed.

We have been consistently working on this restructuring for two years now and we now have the infrastructure ready as horizontal prototype meaning each part works and everybody can start using it. We ate our own dog food and built the first application.

(Frey et al. DBpedia FlexiFusion – Best of Wikipedia > Wikidata > Your Data (accepted at ISWC 2019) .

Now we will go through each part and polish & document it, and will report about it with a blog post each.  Stay tuned !

Is DBpedia Academic or Industrial?

The Semantic Web has a history of being labelled as too academic and a part of it colored DBpedia as well. Here is our personal truth: It is an engineering project and therefore it swings both ways. It is a great academic success with 25,000 papers using the data and  enabling research and innovation. The free data drives research on data-driven research. Also, we are probably THE fastest pathway from lab to market as our industry adoption has unprecedented speed. Proof will follow in the blog posts of the Growth Hack series.

Blog Posts of the Growth Hack series:

(not necessarily in that order, depending on how fast we can polish & document )

• Query DBpedia as SQL – a first service on the Databus
• DBpedia Live Extraction – Realtime updates of Wikipedia
• DBpedia Business Models – How to earn money with DBpedia & the Databus
• MARVIN Release Bot – together with https://blogs.tib.eu/wp/tib/ incl. an update of https://wiki.dbpedia.org/Datasets
• The new forum – https://forum.dbpedia.org is already ready to register, but needs some structure. Intended as replacement of support.dbpedia.org

In addition some announcements of on-going projects:

• GlobalFactSync (GFS) – Syncing facts between Wikipedia and Wikidata
• Energy Databus: LOD GEOSS project focusing on energy system data on the bus
• Supply-Chain-Management Databus – PLASS project focusing on SCM data on the bus

So, stay tuned for our upcoming posts and follow our journey.

Yours

DBpedia Association

The post DBpedia Growth Hack – Fall/Winter 2019 appeared first on DBpedia Association.